Halibut Bycatch Mortality in the Eastern Bering Sea

Mortality of halibut due to bycatch in non-target fisheries in the Eastern Bering Sea (EBS) has severely curtailed the directed halibut fishery in this area. Halibut harvesters in the EBS are strongly dependent on the resource and have seen their catch limits decrease substantially while the limit on bycatch mortality has remained static. Since 2011, bycatch mortality has increased steadily while directed halibut harvests have plummeted. The impacts of bycatch mortality are distributed throughout the range of Pacific halibut as fish from the EBS undertake lifelong migrations to other areas of the stock distribution, as far south as Oregon. The IPHC is working with the North Pacific Fishery Management Council to correct this imbalance and develop a framework whereby controls on the groundfish fisheries will also contribute to conservation of the halibut resource.

For further information and reading:

Bycatch graph - click for larger image

Halibut Bycatch Work Group

The Commission began an initiative in 2011 aimed at better understanding the implications of current halibut bycatch and to explore possible actions to address those concerns. The initiative created a Bycatch Project Team, composed of the IPHC Commissioners, to direct the work and lead the effort. Additionally, a Bycatch Working Group was created to provide analytic support to the Project Team. The IPHC staff also participates by providing analytic and editorial support.

The Project Team has recently completed its report, which includes the Work Group's analysis of bycatch across all areas, the effects of bycatch on the resource and fishery yields, options for reducing bycatch, and options for mitigating the impact of bycatch. The report includes changes made following public comment (Nov-Dec 2013) and direction from the Commission at the 2014 Annual Meeting.

Earlier products of the Work Group are archived at these links:

Comments on this project may be directed to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. at any time.


Estimating Bycatch Mortality

IPHC relies on US and Canadian federal agencies for estimates of bycatch in the major fisheries. Several at-sea monitoring programs exist where halibut bycatch is sampled to provide data for catch estimation and size composition. IPHC assembles these data each year to inform the stock assessment and also to understand the impacts of bycatch on stock productivity and long term health.


Research and Analysis

Listed below are citations for many of the studies conducted by IPHC staff or in collaboration with other researchers. We have provided active links to the papers where possible.

General Studies

Leaman, B. M. and G. H. Williams. 2005. Collaborative Pacific halibut, Hippoglossus stenolepis, bycatch control by Canada and the United States. Mar. Fish. Rev., 66(2):31-37.

Pikitch, E. K., J. R. Wallace, E. A. Babcock, D. L. Erickson, M. Saelens, and G. Oddsson. 1998. Pacific halibut bycatch in the Washington, Oregon, and California groundfish and shrimp trawl fisheries. No. Amer. J. Fish. Mgmt. 18(3):569-586.

Rose, C. 1996. Behavior of North Pacific groundfish encountering trawls: Applications to reduce bycatch. [IN] Solving bycatch: Considerations for today and tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Rep. No. 96-03, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks.

Salveson, S., B. M. Leaman, L.-L. Low, and J. C. Rice. 1992. Report of the Halibut Bycatch Work Group. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm., Tech. Rep. No. 25. 29 p.

Trumble, R. J. 1996. Management of Alaskan longline fisheries to reduce halibut bycatch mortality. [IN] Solving bycatch: Considerations for today and tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Rep. No. 96-03, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks.

Trumble, R. J., S. M. Kaimmer, and G. H. Williams. 2002. Review of the methods used to estimate, reduce, and manage bycatch mortality of Pacific halibut in the commercial longline groundfish fisheries of the Northeast Pacific. Pages 88-96 in J. A. Lucy and A. L. Studholme, editors. Catch and release in marine recreational fisheries. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 30, Bethesda, Maryland.

Williams, G. H., C. C. Schmitt, S. H. Hoag, and J. D. Berger. 1989. Incidental catch and mortality of Pacific halibut, 1962-1989. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm., Tech. Rep. No. 23. 94 p.

Gear effects and Survival studies

Clark, W. G., S. H. Hoag, R. J. Trumble, and G. H. Williams. 1992. Re-estimation of survival for trawl caught halibut released in different condition factors. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm. Rep. of Assess. & Res. Activ. 1992: 197-206.

Gauvin, J. R., K. Haflinger, and M. Nerini. 1996. Implementation of a voluntary bycatch avoidance program in the flatfish fisheries of the eastern Bering Sea. [IN] Solving bycatch: Considerations for today and tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Rep. No. 96-03, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks.

Geernaert, T. O., H. L. Gilroy, S. M. Kaimmer, G. H. Williams, and R. J. Trumble. 2001. A feasibility study that investigates options for monitoring bycatch of the Short-tailed albatross in the Pacific halibut fishery off Alaska. Int'l. Pac. Halibut Comm., Seattle, WA. [Addendum]

Hoag, S. H. 1971. Effects of domestic trawling on the halibut stocks of British Columbia. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm., Sci. Rep. No. 53. 18 p.

Hoag, S. H. 1975. Survival of halibut released after capture by trawls. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm., Sci. Rep. No. 57. 18 p.

Hoag, S. H. and R. R. French. 1976. The incidental catch of halibut by foreign trawlers. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm., Sci. Rep. No. 60. 24 p.

Kaimmer, S. M. 1994. Halibut injury and mortality associated with manual and automated removal from setline hooks. Fish. Res. 20. p. 165-179.

Kaimmer, S. M. and R. J. Trumble. 1997. Survival of Pacific halibut released from longlines: hooking location and release methods. In: Fisheries Bycatch: Consequences And Management. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Rep. No. 97-02, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks, p. 101-105.

Kaimmer, S. M. and R. J. Trumble. 1998. Injury, condition, and mortality of Pacific halibut bycatch following careful release by Pacific cod and sablefish longline fisheries. Fish. Res. 38:131-144.

Neilson, J. D., K. G. Waiwood, and S. J. Smith. 1989. Survival of Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) caught by longline and otter trawl gear. Can. J. Fish . Aquat. Sci., 46(5):887-897.

Smith, W. T. 1996. Reduction of halibut bycatch and associated mortality in the Bering Sea cod fishery. [IN] Solving bycatch: Considerations for today and tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Rep. No. 96-03, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks.

Stone, M. and C. G. Bublitz. 1996. Cod trawl separator panel: Potential for reducing halibut bycatch. [IN] Solving bycatch: Considerations for today and tomorrow. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Rep. No. 96-03, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks.

Trumble, R. J., S. M. Kaimmer, and G. H. Williams. 2000. Estimation of discard mortality rates for Pacific halibut in groundfish longline fisheries. No. Amer. J. Fish. Mgmt. 20:931-939.

Trumble, R., J., G. H. Williams, and S. E. Hughes. 1995. Methods to improve survival of Pacific halibut bycatch discarded from a factory trawler. Pages 591-610 [In] Proceedings Of The International Symposium On North Pacific Flatfish. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Rep. No. 95-04, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks.

Williams, G.H., D. McCaughran, S. Hoag, and T. Koeneman. 1982. A comparison of Pacific halibut and Tanner crab catches in (1) side-entry and top-entry crab pots and (2) side-entry crab pots with and without Tanner boards. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm., Tech. Rep. No. 19. 35 p.

Impact analyses

Clark, W. G., and S. R. Hare. 1998. Accounting for bycatch in management of the Pacific halibut fishery. No. Amer. J. Fish. Mgmt. 18:809-821.

Sullivan, P. J., R. J. Trumble and S. A. Adlerstein. 1994. Pacific halibut bycatch in the groundfish fisheries: Effects on and management implications for the halibut fishery. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm., Sci. Rep. No. 78. 28 p.

Electronic Monitoring

Ames, R. T. 2005. The efficacy of electronic monitoring systems: A case study on the applicability of video technology for longline fisheries management. Int. Pac. Halibut Comm., Sci. Rep. No. 80. 64 p.

Ames, R. T., B. M. Leaman, and K. L. Ames. 2007. Evaluation of video technology for monitoring of multispecies longline catches. No. Amer. J. Fish. Mgmt. 27:955-964.

Ames, R. T., G. H. Williams, and S. M. Fitzgerald. 2005. Using digital video monitoring systems in fisheries: Application for monitoring compliance of seabird avoidance devices and seabird mortality in Pacific halibut longline fisheries. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-152, 93 p.

Cahalan, J.A., B.M. Leaman, G.H. Williams, B.H. Mason, and W.A. Karp. 2010. Bycatch characterization in the Pacific halibut fishery: A field test of electronic monitoring. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-213, 66 p.

McElderry, H., R. Reid, and D. Pahti. 2008. A pilot study to evaluate the use of electronic monitoring on a Bering Sea groundfish factory trawler. Intl. Pac. Halibut Comm., Tech Rep. 51. 31 p.


F/T Northern Glacier
October 7-28, 1993
Conducted By
International Pacific Halibut Commission
National Marine Fisheries Service
Highliner's Association
December 15, 1993


The International Pacific Halibut Commission, the Highliners Association (with Natural Resource Consultants), and the NMFS Alaska Fishery Science Center (AFSC) conducted an experiment to evaluate methods of increasing halibut bycatch survival in bottom trawls. The experiment involved sorting and discarding halibut from the groundfish catch more rapidly than is now current practice, and estimating the savings in halibut discard mortality rates. The experiment took place aboard the F/T Northern Glacier from October 6 through 29.

Halibut are caught as bycatch by most gear types used in North Pacific groundfish fisheries, but the majority are taken by trawls, especially those targeting on Pacific cod. Bycatch mortality could be reduced by improving survival and several methods have been suggested to accomplish this goal. One way would be to sort the halibut from the catch on deck, before groundfish and halibut are dumped into the below-deck holding tanks. A screen or grid has been suggested as a means of filtering halibut, particularly large halibut, from the catch. Another possibility is to improve the sorting methods used in the factory, in a manner that returns halibut to the sea more quickly than is currently practiced. Termed enhanced sorting, this practice could improve survival for the smaller fish that previously passed through the grid. This experiment was designed to address these issues.


The experiment involved sorting and discarding halibut from the groundfish catch more rapidly than is now current practice, and estimating the savings in halibut discard mortality rates.

The experiment addressed the following questions:

1) What percent of the total halibut bycatch can be screened by the grid?

2) What percent of the total halibut bycatch can be sorted during the period of enhanced sorting?

3) What is the survival rate of halibut discarded from the grid screening and the enhanced sorting, compared to normal discards?

4) How much additional operating time accrues from the sorting procedures?

5) Will grid screening or enhanced sorting increase overall survival of halibut bycatch from trawls?

Specific objectives were:

1) Determine the sorting capability of a grid or screen placed over the deck opening to the factory holding tanks.

2) Determine if overall halibut mortality is reduced by sorting large halibut out on deck and immediately returning them to the sea.

3) Determine if halibut mortality is reduced by "speed sorting" of bycatch from the groundfish in the factory.


The vessel targeted Pacific cod in a normal commercial manner over the full 24-hour period. The experiment focused on the bottom trawl Pacific cod fishery because it is allotted the greatest portion of bycatch in the Bering Sea. The vessel operated in the Bering Sea (NMFS areas 517 and 521) and on Sanak Bank in the Gulf of Alaska. Two NMFS observers, one supplied by the vessel and one by the AFSC, determined halibut viability from each haul and sampled the groundfish catch on most hauls.

Two specific experiments were conducted. The first experiment (the Grid Sorting Experiment) evaluated two improved methods of sorting halibut from groundfish against a control method. For many factory layouts, halibut and other prohibited species and discards transit a series of conveyor belts to reach the exit chute. Forty-five minutes or more may elapse for the discard to move from the hold to the exit chute. We considered this procedure for handling discards to be the control method. The second experiment (Live Tank Holding) examined the relative survival of halibut within the established condition categories of excellent, poor, and dead.

For the Grid Sorting Experiment, three treatments were performed: (1) deck sorting with a grid; (2) enhanced sorting of the catch in the factory; and (3) normal sorting in the factory (the control). On the Northern Glacier, a single, short conveyor led from the hold to the exit chute. Retained fish were selected from the conveyor, and all else was quickly discarded. The regular procedure on the Northern Glacier was designated the enhanced treatment, while the control treatment was simulated by delaying processing for 45 minutes. Thirty hauls for each treatment were conducted, for a total of 90 hauls. We randomized the order of treatments. Other factors monitored were tow duration, haul size, time on deck, and fish size. A factorial analysis will be conducted on the results to determine significance among these factors. In some cases, the data may be post-stratified for the analysis.

The Live Tank Holding Experiment was conducted to reaffirm relative differences in survival of the three condition categories. Halibut sorted from the catch on deck and in the factory were placed in holding tanks with running seawater for 3 days (72 hours) until the end of the trip, when holding time was reduced to about 12 hours. Differences in viability going in and coming out of the tanks will be compared among the 3 conditions (excellent, poor, and dead). Approximately 20 halibut at a time were selected for placement into a tank. Post-stratification will also be done on important factors, notably sorting method, tow duration, time on deck, and fish size. An ANOVA analysis is planned for the results.

The first four hauls on the first fishing day were used to set up specific sampling procedures, and the first haul tested appropriate grid dimensions. The two grid dimensions examined were 9 inches by 11 inches and 11 inches by 14 inches. These are based on an even division of the deck opening, the first yielding a grid 3 openings deep and 6 wide. The second provided 2 openings deep by 6 wide. The vessel had on-board welding equipment to modify the grid dimensions, which proved to be unnecessary.

Tow duration was not predetermined, but two duration strata of > 3 hr and < 3 hr were established. The distribution of tow times was adjusted so that equal numbers of short and long hauls occurred for each treatment.

While no limit was set on the catch of groundfish or halibut, we anticipated catching the following quantities of fish:

Groundfish (other than Pacific cod) 700 mt

Pacific cod 1,500 mt

Prohibited species

Pacific halibut less than 50 mt

The vessel was allowed to retain, process, and sell the groundfish caught. Only the traditional prohibited species (crabs, salmon, halibut, herring) were required to be discarded.


Grid Sorting Experiment

During this experiment, data on length (cm), condition factor (excellent, poor, or dead) observations, and time of observation from the net coming on board were collected from each halibut encountered. Such data will allow enumeration and frequency distributions for the treatments (total halibut, total halibut from grid screening or enhanced sorting, and total halibut missed by the experimental treatment). NMFS observers conducted basket sampling to define the groundfish catch and determined halibut condition, so that these data are consistent with data collected in commercial fishery situations.

A schedule of the treatment for each haul alerted the bridge and the factory so that hauls could be made with factory processing capacity available. As each codend came on board, a biologist started a stopwatch; time of each halibut was recorded to the nearest minute. The observer and the skipper each estimated the groundfish catch. For grid sort treatments, the grid was placed over the hold, the deck crew grabbed halibut prior to the hatch and on the grid, and passed them to biologists for measurement and viability determination by the observer. When deck sampling was completed, the biological team moved to the factory where length, viability and time data were collected for all remaining halibut. For enhanced and control treatments, the sampling process started in the factory. Enhanced treatments started processing groundfish and sorting halibut quickly after dumping to the hold, while control treatments started processing 45 minutes after dumping to simulate the time needed for halibut to transit the factory to the exit chute typical of most layouts.

Live Tank Holding

Three specially-constructed deck-mounted holding tanks, each about 80 square feet by 36 inches high, with seawater circulation, an inside lip, dump door, and water overflow sump were used for holding halibut. Originally, only halibut sorted on deck were scheduled for these tanks, but halibut sorted out from the factory were also placed in these tanks when the factory tanks proved impractical. Initially, halibut collected from the factory were held in one or two 4'x4'x15' holding bins fed with circulating water. Water flow rates exchanged bin volumes about once per hour. Unfortunately, water jets in the holding bins, designed to lubricate large volumes of dead fish flowing to an exit, churned the water significantly, greatly diminishing survival. Halibut from the factory were carried as quickly as possible to the holding tanks on deck.

When a fish was selected for holding, a round, uniquely-numbered ID tag was placed on the tail using a nylon electrical tie. Selected fish were measured, condition factor assessed, and ID number noted on a form. Halibut were released after three days, and date and time of release, ID number, and viability noted on a separate form.


Ninety five hauls made during the experiment included four test hauls, one invalid haul caused by a ripped net, and the ninety hauls specified in the experimental design (Table 1). Catch weight ranged from about 5 mt to 35 mt per haul, but most were in the 10 to 15 mt range. The experimental hauls were divided into 30 hauls for each treatment, and the hauls of each treatment partitioned equally among < 3 hr and > 3 hr tows. The number of halibut caught reached 13,861, at an estimated weight of 38,000 kg (2.75 kg/halibut). Groundfish harvest totalled 1,189 mt, of which the retained portion was 243 mt of Pacific cod and 496 mt of pollock. The remaining 450 mt, mostly arrowtooth flounder, other flatfish, and Atka mackerel, were discarded. The halibut bycatch rate was 32 kg/mt. Total Pacific cod and halibut were significantly below the anticipated catch of 1,500 mt of Pacific cod and the maximum 50 mt of halibut. Pollock and discarded groundfish somewhat exceeded the 700 mt anticipated for other groundfish. Bycatch rates were higher than expected, and had the anticipated 2,200 mt of groundfish been harvested, halibut catch would have reached approximately 70 mt.

Approximately equal numbers of halibut were caught in each of the three treatments, with 4,714 in the grid sorting, 4,244 in the control sorting, and 4,903 in the enhanced sorting. In the grid sorting, 1,927 halibut (41%) were collected on deck. While weights have not yet been calculated, larger sizes of halibut sorted on deck probably put the proportion of deck-sorted halibut at least at 50% by weight.

The grid selected for use, although the smaller of the two available, did not directly filter out many of the halibut. The high proportion of deck-sorted halibut was due to the slower rate of dumping catch from the cod end to the hold, and the opportunity for the deck crew to sort out halibut pouring from the cod end to the hatch. Time required to dump a cod end after the net came on board normally ranged from about 90 seconds to 2 1/2 minutes, while a grid sort took about 10 to 15 minutes to dump.

While condition factor data and survival estimates are not yet available, several obvious conclusions result from observing halibut in the treatments. Halibut collected on deck during the grid sort experienced a high proportion of excellent condition factors. Only a few poor condition halibut were encountered, and halibut in dead condition were rarely seen. For enhanced sorting or grid sorting in the factory, nearly all halibut were in poor condition for about the first 40-50 minutes after the net came on board. A few excellent and dead halibut were noted. For control sorting and for enhanced or grid sorting after about 40-50 minutes, nearly all halibut were in dead condition, with occasional poor and the rare excellent halibut.

Holding tank experiments did not provide as much useable data as anticipated, because of situations with high mortality of halibut in the tanks. Bleeding tanks in the factory did not work because the water flow system agitated the halibut. A sloped floor in the bleeding tanks that prevented halibut from resting without piling up may have also contributed to the mortality. Of three tanks on deck, only one provided consistent data. The best tank was nearly square, while the other two were long and narrow. Vessel movement caused traveling waves in the narrow tanks that disrupted the halibut. In cases of prolonged rough weather, nearly all halibut died, regardless of initial condition factor. A total of 320 halibut from 17 hauls were placed in the live tanks for the standard three day period. Eighty-one more from four hauls were held for 12 hours. Nine hauls of the long holding period were from grid sort hauls, three from control sort hauls, and five from enhanced sort hauls. Three hauls from the short holding period were grid sort, and the last was enhanced sort.


Ninety hauls equally divided among three sorting treatments provided 13,861 halibut for which condition factor, length, and time on deck were collected. On-deck sorting provided the highest survival, and control sorting caused the most mortality. Pollock and Pacific cod made up the retained catch. About 62% of the total was retained, and the remaining 38% was discarded. At 32 kg/mt, the halibut bycatch rate was higher than expected.

Holding tank experiments were less successful than anticipated. Tanks in the factory could not be used because of excessive mortality, and periods of rough weather caused mortality not related to condition factor in two of the three deck tanks. Periods of good weather during several holding periods permitted useable data from several hauls.


              Trip 1:                                    Trip 2:                
      October 7 -- October 19                    October 19 -- October 28       

Gregg Williams, IPHC                       Gregg Williams, IPHC                 
Janet Wall, NMFS/AFSC Observer Pgm         Janet Wall, NMFS/AFSC Observer Pgm   
Steve Hughes, NRC                          Steve Hughes, NRC                    
Brent Paine, NPFMC                         Chris Oliver, NPFMC                  
Tracy Schall, NMFS/D. Hbr Observer Pgm     Tracy Schall, NMFS/D. Hbr Observer Pgm  
Mike Sloan, NMFS/AKR                       Bob Trumble, IPHC                    
Robert Morrow, vessel observer             Robert Morrow, vessel observer       
Shari Gross, HANA                                                               


IPHC International Pacific Halibut Commission, Seattle

NMFS/AFSC National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle

NMFS/AKR National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Region Office, Juneau

NMFS/D Hbr National Marine Fisheries Service, Observer Program, Dutch Harbor

NRC Natural Resources Consultants, Seattle

NPFMC North Pacific Fishery Management Council, Anchorage

HANA Halibut Association of North America, Seattle

For further information, please call Bob Trumble or Gregg Williams at the International Pacific Halibut Commission, Seattle, Washington, (206)634-1838.

Table 1. Preliminary catch totals during 1993 Halibut Bycatch Survival/Sorting Study. Codes for treatment are CL=Control, ES=Enhanced Sort, and GS=Grid Sort. Haul 590 was considered invalid.

          Haul                            of                 Cumul.       Live   Cumul. 
  Date     No.                          Halibut               Total       Tank    Total 

                 Treatment      Deck   Factory      Total                               

 07Oct     567      Test          20       n/a         20        20                     
           568      Test          88       173        261       281                     
           569      Test         105       n/a        105       386                     
           570      Test          66       n/a         66       452                     

 08Oct     571       GS          182       178        360       360          0        0 
           572       CL            0        37         37       397          0        0 
           573       ES            0         9          9       406          0        0 

 09Oct     574       CL            0        13         13       419          0        0 
           575       ES            0        57         57       476          0        0 
           576       GS           94        38        132       608         14       14 
           577       GS           41        23         64       672          8       22 
           578       CL            0        68         68       740         12       34 

 10Oct     579       ES            0        58         58       798          0       34 
           580       CL            0        53         53       851          0       34 
           581       GS           24         4         28       879          7       41 
           582       ES            0        64         64       943          0       41 

 11Oct     583       GS           60        14         74     1,017          0       41 
           584       ES            0         8          8     1,025          0       41 
           585       CL            0        29         29     1,054          0       41 

 12Oct     586       ES            0        65         65     1,119          0       41 
           587       CL            0         6          6     1,125          0       41 
           588       GS           12         4         16     1,141          3       44 
           589       CL            0        55         55     1,196          0       44 

 13Oct     590                                                                          
           591       GS           53         9         62     1,258         18       62 
           592       ES            0        69         69     1,327         13       75 
           593       GS            2        37         39     1,366          0       75 

 14Oct     594       ES            0        96         96     1,462          0       75 
           595       CL            0        79         79     1,541          0       75 
           596       ES            0        50         50     1,591          0       75 

 15Oct     597       CL            0         2          2     1,593          0       75 
           598       GS            4         6         10     1,603          0       75 
           599       CL            0        54         54     1,657          0       75 
           600       GS            3        25         28     1,685          0       75 
           601       ES            0        52         52     1,737          0       75 

 16Oct     602       GS           45        55        100     1,837         18       93 
           603       ES            0        85         85     1,922         20      113                              

 17Oct     604       CL            0       145        145     2,067         22      135 
           605       ES            0       143        143     2,210          0      135 
           606       CL            0       123        123     2,333          0      135 

 18Oct     607       GS           32       109        141     2,474          0      135 
           608       CL            0        27         27     2,501          0      135 
           609       GS          111       116        227     2,728          0      135 
           610       ES            0       479        479     3,207          0      135 
           611       CL            0       172        172     3,379          0      135 
           612       ES            0       196        196     3,575          0      135 

 19Oct     613       GS          107       242        349     3,924          0      135 
           614       ES            0       160        160     4,084          0      135 
           615       GS           72        82        154     4,238         63      198 

 20Oct     616       CL            0       108        108     4,346          0      198 
           617       CL            0       169        169     4,515         19      217 
           618       GS           52       113        165     4,680          0      217 

 21Oct     619       ES            0        87         87     4,767         21      238 
           620       GS           55        93        148     4,915          0      238 
           621       CL            0       519        519     5,434          0      238 

 22Oct     622       ES            0       107        107     5,541          0      238 
           623       ES            0       119        119     5,660          0      238 
           624       CL            0       272        272     5,932          0      238 
           625       GS           68       125        193     6,125         22      260 
           626       CL            0       191        191     6,316          0      260 
           627       GS           19        13         32     6,348          0      260 

 23Oct     628       ES            0       252        252     6,600          0      260 
           629       GS           74       109        183     6,783          0      260 
           630       ES            0       139        139     6,922          0      260 
           631       CL            0       134        134     7,056          0      260 
           632       ES            0       136        136     7,192         20      280 

 24Oct     633       CL            0       214        214     7,406          0      280 
           634       GS          140       227        367     7,773          0      280 
           635       CL            0       201        201     7,974          0      280 
           636       GS           80       144        224     8,198          0      280 
           637       ES            0       221        221     8,419         20      300 
           638       GS           82       186        268     8,687          0      300 

 25Oct     639       ES            0       313        313     9,000          0      300 
           640       CL            0       255        255     9,255          0      300 
           641       ES            0       232        232     9,487          0      300 
           642       CL            0       108        108     9,595          0      300 
           643       GS           43        68        111     9,706         20      320 
           644       CL            0       263        263     9,969          0      320 

 26Oct     645       GS           97       174        271    10,240          0      320 
           646       ES            0       273        273    10,513          0      320 
           647       GS           37       107        144    10,657          0      320 
           648       CL            0       187        187    10,844          0      320 
           649       ES            0       163        163    11,007          0      320 

 27Oct     650       ES            0       260        260    11,267          0      320 
           651       CL            0       158        158    11,425          0      320 
           652       GS          146       167        313    11,738         19      339 
           653       CL            0        44         44    11,782          0      339 
           654       GS           42        75        117    11,899          0      339 
           655       ES            0        99         99    11,998          0      339 
           656       GS           51        61        112    12,110         20      359 

 28Oct     657       ES            0       281        281    12,391          0      359 
           658       CL            0       351        351    12,742          0      359 
           659       CL            0       207        207    12,949          0      359 
           660       ES            0       630        630    13,579         22      381 
           661       GS           99       183        282    13,861         20      401